Oneless Oneness is at once philosophical manifesto and guide. In an aphoristic style, he explains how they can help us deal with all-too-human issues: from guilt, regrets, and compulsion, to forgiveness, mindful enjoyment, and matters of the heart.ĭiscover how Tao’s culture-transcending truth reconciles Eastern spirituality with Western rational philosophy. Inspired by Zen teachers and based on his own experience, the author uses his problem-solving engineer attitude for a thought-provoking take on satori and finding Tao-the key steps to enlightenment. ĝid you know that you don’t have to meditate to awaken to Tao? You only need an open mind-and a book like this.Would you like to enjoy the benefits of enlightenment too?.ĝo you wonder what the Zen masters mean by enlightenment?.
Oneless Oneness is a fresh look at ancient Zen philosophy-not for the dogmatic, ideological, or faint-hearted, but for rational minds open to plainspoken arguments challenging widespread beliefs. What looks absurd and disturbing at first can grow into inspirational insight. Why do almost all believe in a device that is operated by sheer mind power? That is what my book is about.Enlightenment is the ultimate self-help because it helps you realize that the self does not exist. Rather than about quantum computers, it is about the tricks our minds play on us. The belief in the promise of quantum computers is based on the most common illusion because it comes with having a conscious mind! *Here* it becomes interesting for existential rationalism. I don’t doubt that quantum maths is spot on. The quantum computer has some surprising similarities with the perpetual motion machine people like Leonardo da Vinci worked on more than five centuries ago. My main argument is that the premise of quantum computers is a contradiction in terms: operation through pure observation. I’m not a physicist, so what gives me the confidence to write about it with such unconventional finality? Did I maybe lose the plot? I don’t think so, so let me explain.įor those who don’t know, I posit that quantum computers cannot compute. In “Existential Rationalism: Handling Hume’s Fork,” link:, I talk about quantum computers, and people have been asking me why. I’ve been working on some presentations on YouTube, for example, this one. Thought I’d give you an update on what I’ve been up to since I got so much heartwarming interest for my previous post.
0 kommentar(er)
